On June 26, 2017, the United States Supreme Court partially reinstated the Trump administration’s travel ban. The ban prevents citizens of six Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States. The countries are Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.
The ban has been controversial since it was first announced in January 2017. Critics argue that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory. Supporters of the ban argue that it is necessary to protect national security.
The Supreme Court’s decision was controversial. Some people argue that it is a victory for national security, while others argue that it is a victory for discrimination.
Contents
Was Trump’s travel ban constitutional?
On January 27, 2017, President Donald Trump issued an executive order suspending entry of all refugees to the United States for 120 days, suspending entry of all Syrian refugees indefinitely, and suspending entry of all citizens from seven Muslim-majority countries for 90 days. The order generated widespread protests and criticism, and was ultimately blocked by federal courts.
Critics of the order argued that it violated the Constitution’s prohibition on religious discrimination, while supporters argued that it was necessary to protect national security. The order was ultimately struck down by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in February 2017.
The legality of Trump’s travel ban has been the subject of much debate. On the one hand, the Constitution prohibits the government from discriminating on the basis of religion. On the other hand, the president has broad authority to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States if he determines that it is in the national interest.
The question of whether Trump’s travel ban was constitutional ultimately turned on the question of whether it was motivated by religious discrimination. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that it was, ruling that the order “plainly discriminates on the basis of nationality.”
The Trump administration has argued that the order is not a “ban” on Muslims, but rather a temporary suspension of entry for certain countries. However, the courts have rejected this argument, ruling that the order’s intent was to ban Muslims from entering the United States.
Is Executive Order 13780 still in effect?
Executive Order 13780, signed by President Donald Trump on March 6, 2017, barred citizens of six Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States. The order was blocked by a federal court on March 15, 2017, and a revised order was signed on March 6, 2018.
However, questions remain about the status of the original order. The Department of Homeland Security has stated that the original order is no longer in effect, but the White House has not issued a statement confirming this.
The original order barred citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the United States for 90 days. It also suspended the admission of all refugees for 120 days and barred Syrian refugees indefinitely.
The order was blocked by a federal court on March 15, 2017, after two Iraqi refugees and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit. The court ruled that the order violated the Constitution by discriminating on the basis of religion.
On March 6, 2018, President Trump signed a revised order, which removed Iraq from the list of banned countries and exempted visa and green card holders. The revised order is currently in effect.
What is the Presidential Proclamation 9645?
What is the Presidential Proclamation 9645?
The Presidential Proclamation 9645, also known as the “extreme vetting” proclamation, is an executive order signed by United States President Donald Trump on September 24, 2017. The order imposes additional restrictions on the entry of foreign nationals into the United States, with the aim of protecting national security.
Specifically, the order suspends the entry of most foreign nationals from eight countries: Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen, and Somalia. Entry is also suspended for certain government officials and their family members from Venezuela.
The order provides for case-by-case waivers to be granted by the United States Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the United States Secretary of State.
The order was met with criticism from Democrats and human rights groups, who argued that it was a Muslim ban in disguise and that it would not make the United States safer. Supporters of the order argued that it was necessary to protect national security.
The order was challenged in court, and in December 2017 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court’s ruling that blocked the majority of the order. The Supreme Court allowed the ban to go into effect in December 2017, with certain exceptions.
Is Executive Order 13769 still in effect?
On January 27, 2017, President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.” The order, commonly referred to as “Executive Order 13769” or “the travel ban,” barred citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States for 90 days, all refugees for 120 days, and Syrian refugees indefinitely.
A federal court blocked the order on February 3, and a revised order was signed on March 6. The revised order removed Iraq from the list of banned countries, exempted those with valid visas and green cards, and removed the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees.
The revised order was also blocked by a federal court, and the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the case in October.
Is the travel ban still in effect?
The travel ban, also known as Executive Order 13769, was first signed by President Donald Trump on January 27, 2017. The order suspended the admission of refugees into the United States for 120 days and barred Syrian refugees indefinitely. Additionally, it blocked citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the United States for 90 days. These countries were Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.
The order caused widespread chaos and protests at airports around the country as people were detained and deported. The order was eventually blocked by federal courts.
On March 6, 2017, President Trump signed a new executive order, Executive Order 13787, which replaced the original travel ban. The new order removed Iraq from the list of banned countries, made exceptions for certain visa applicants, and removed the indefinite ban on Syrian refugees.
However, on June 26, 2017, the US Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s ruling that blocked the travel ban. The Court stated that the ban could not be enforced against people with a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”
This means that the travel ban is currently blocked and is not in effect.
When was the travel ban enacted?
On January 27, 2017, President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing a travel ban on nationals of seven Muslim-majority countries. The order, which was later revised, barred all immigrants and non-immigrant visitors from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen from entering the United States for 90 days. It also suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for 120 days.
The order sparked protests and confusion at airports across the country as travelers were detained and some were deported. A number of lawsuits were filed challenging the legality of the travel ban, and a federal judge in Seattle issued a nationwide temporary restraining order blocking its enforcement.
The Trump administration appealed the ruling, but on February 9, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the restraining order. The Trump administration then asked the Supreme Court to intervene, and on June 26, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
On September 24, the Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing the travel ban to go into effect with some exceptions. The ruling was met with protests and criticism from civil rights organizations.
Is proclamation 10043 still in effect?
Yes, Proclamation 10043 is still in effect. This proclamation, which was signed by President Rodrigo Duterte in December of 2017, declared a state of national emergency due to the threat of terrorism.
Under this proclamation, the government has been granted enhanced powers to deal with the threat of terrorism. These powers include the ability to detain suspects for longer periods of time, to restrict freedom of movement, and to impose curfews.
The state of national emergency will remain in effect until December of 2019, or until it is revoked by the president.